This research project systematically examines how International Development Agencies (IDAs) are using Political Economy Analysis (PEA) both as formal evaluations and more informally as ongoing practices of engagement and relationship building to inform IDA practices in particular contexts – centring on IDA activities at the country office level.
This project studies the use of PEA by UK Department for International Development (DFID) and World Bank country offices in Bangladesh, Ghana and Uganda.
How can PEA (Political Economic Analysis) conducted by international development agencies successfully engender and deepen state commitment to (and capacity for) inclusive development?
Methods and research design
Groundwork and a baseline will involve document review and semi-structured interviews with relevant World Bank and DFID employees and independent advisors involved in the PEA process. Tracking is one of the central phases of the project and will involve semi- structured interviews with key informants in country offices and with those within the relevant state whom they highlight as key partners.
How does this project fit within ESID’s research agenda?
This is a vital element of the ESID research project, as it deals directly with issues of the production of commitment for inclusive development. Analysis of the types of activities and actions successfully undertaken by IDAs to increase the commitment to and/or capacity for development of institutions, elites, groups and individuals will be a significant contribution towards ESID’s interrogation of these processes. The findings will also be vital to discussions of the role of external agents in these processes.
|Lead Researcher||David Hulme||The University of Manchester, UK|
|Researcher||Sarah Hunt||The University of Manchester, UK|
|Researcher||Pablo Yanguas||The University of Manchester, UK|
Publications and presentations
Yanguas, Pablo. April 2015. ‘The role and responsibility of foreign aid in recipient political settlements‘. ESID Working Paper 56.
Yanguas, Pablo. April 2015. ‘Making political analysis useful: Adjusting and scaling‘. ESID Briefing Paper 12.
Yanguas, Pablo, and David Hulme. 2014b. ‘Mainstreaming political economy analysis (PEA) in donor agencies‘. ESID Briefing Paper 5.
Yanguas, Pablo, and David Hulme. 2014a. ‘Can aid bureaucracies think politically? The administrative challenges of political economy analysis (PEA) in DFID and the World Bank‘. ESID Working Paper 33.
Routley, Laura, and David Hulme. 2013. ‘Donors, development agencies and the use of Political Economy Analysis: getting to grips with the politics of development?‘ ESID Working Paper 19.
Yanguas, Pablo and Jordan, Chris, 29 April 2015 blog: Political analysis: sticking plaster or salvation?
Yanguas, Pablo, 7 November 2014 blog: ‘Doing Development Differently: The future is now-ish‘.
Wild, Leni, 11 August 2014 blog: ‘Learning why and how reform works will improve UK aid‘ .
Hunt, Sarah, 17 June 2014 blog: ‘Training in political economy analysis‘.
Yanguas, Pablo, 7 May 2014 blog: ‘Politics in the trenches of development: Mainstreaming political economy analysis in aid agencies‘.
Yanguas, Pablo. 15 November 2013. ‘Principle and practice in Political Economy Analysis: A comparative study of DFID and the World Bank in Ghana’. Presentation at Making Politics Practical II, University of Birmingham: